Headshot of Cass Wilder with a neutral expression against a clean background, used as the author portrait for Politiglue.

Two voices.

One national nervous system.

Essays about power, incentives, and what we’re being trained to tolerate.

E. H. Mercer on institutions and precedent.

Cass Wilder on media, incentives, and the feed.

Politiglue is an editorial project about what politics does to people.

Not just policy. Not just personalities. Incentives, institutions, and the permission structures that make bad behaviour feel normal.

We argue clearly. We keep standards. We do not confuse neutrality theatre with fairness.

Illustration of the U.S. Capitol with visible cracks, symbolizing institutional strain and democratic fragility.

Read by Voice

Politiglue articles attributed to Politiglue are written in a shared editorial voice. They reflect collaborative research, internal review, and a commitment to clarity over commentary.

E. H. Mercer writes about politics the way a structural engineer looks at a bridge: not impressed by the paint, deeply concerned about the load-bearing beams. He focuses on institutions under stress, the quiet power of precedent, and the small permissions that turn “unthinkable” into “normal.”

Mercer isn’t here for daily outrage. He’s here for cause and effect. His essays track how norms erode, how accountability gets rebranded as “partisan,” and how a republic becomes brittle when standards are applied only to the other side.

Headshot of Cass Wilder with a neutral expression against a clean background, used as the author portrait for Politiglue.

Cass Wilder writes about politics as an interface: what the feed rewards, what it punishes, and how attention gets shaped long before anyone reaches a ballot box. She follows the incentives behind modern public life, where outrage outperforms nuance and certainty travels faster than facts.

Wilder is interested in the machinery more than the personalities. She maps how narratives spread, how identity becomes performance, and how “permanent emergency” turns citizens into spectators. If you’ve ever felt your mood change after five minutes online, she’s writing about the system that did that.

How we write

This is the house style. Clear targets, clear stakes, minimal fluff.

What you’ll get here

Arguments you can disagree with, but can’t ignore.

Clear arguments, not vibes

We pick a claim and defend it.

Minimal fluff

No filler, no corporate throat-clearing.

Two consistent voices

Two lenses, same standards.

No talking down

Writing that assumes readers can handle complexity.

What we track

The lanes we cover. Not to “drive dialogue,” but to name incentives and consequences.